ReFinder

A journey to an AI-powered research dashboard

UI/UX

Product Design

Research

Role

User Research, UI/UX Design, User Testing

Duration

1 week

Tools

Overview

ReFinder is the result of our team's exploration into the landscape of AI companions and digital assistants, which grows increasingly prevalent in student life. What do students expect from AI companions? What's working? What's not? And what's missing?

ReFinder is an AI-powered dashboard that aims to enhance its users' researching experience.

The Context

Students today are surrounded by AI companions that offer everything from personalized study support to focus coaching, wellness tracking, and even emotional encouragement.

These tools are growing more advanced and more pervasive, yet the impact they have on student life is still unfolding.

Our Process

Emphasize & Define

  • User Research

  • Problem Definition

  • Personas

  • Journey Mapping

Ideate & Design

  • Sketch

  • Wireframe

  • Prototype

Test & Iterate

  • User Testing

  • Future Iteration

User Reseach

Goals

  • Understand how students use and perceive AI

  • Identify opportunities to improve that experience

  • Design and test a product concept

22 people, diverse in age & major
  • AI Use: When? What for?

  • Experiences: expected vs unexpected

  • Feelings

22 people, diverse in age & major
  • AI Use: When? What for?

  • Experiences: expected vs unexpected

  • Feelings

AI is a Productivity Tool

AI saves time and simplifies complex information

  • “It helps me get things done faster”

  • “I just use it when I’m behind”

Credibility & Quality

Students wish AI tools could cite credible academic sources

Personal Frustrations

Users worry about over reliance and lack of boundaries

  • “AI makes people stop thinking critically”

The "Intentional" User

Marcus

  • 19-year-old male

  • 2nd year undergraduate student, majoring in political science

  • Acknowledges the presence of AI but tries to be more selective of the instances he uses it (i.e., when under time pressure)

The "Frequent" User

Maya

  • 25-year-old female

  • Full-time 3rd year nursing student, starting hands-on training and clinical rotations in the emergency department

  • Uses AI daily to expedite studies, reading, and overall preparations

Prioritizing One : Marcus

The university is a research-driven institution that values thoughtful, deliberate engagement. Marcus is the type of student — intentional, analytical, and academically rigorous — that aligns with both the university’s culture and the goals of this project.

In short, Marcus represents the kind of user we’re designing for: someone who doesn’t just want faster answers, but better ones.

Identifying Opportunities

Scenario

With midterms approaching, Marcus has several assignments due, including a heavily research-based paper.

Pain Points

  1. Gathering sources causes overwhelm due to information overload. 

  2. Uncertainty about the credibility of AI outputs

  3. AI feedback is too generic.

  4. Concern about over reliance and about whether his work truly reflects his understanding.

The Opportunity

Marcus does not just want help writing faster; he wants help thinking critically.

Ideation

Design

Based on our understanding of our primary user, we began sketching out ideas for an AI-powered assistant to make writing those last-minute papers a tad more accommodating. 

Ideation

Design

Based on our understanding of our primary user, we began sketching out ideas for an AI-powered assistant to make writing those last-minute papers a tad more accommodating. 

The Ideas that Stuck

Research is Digestible

Users have the ability to easily save, search through, and organize their research.

Sources are Credible

Academically-credible database to ensure accurate information.

AI Supports Efficiency

AI summarizes, suggests related sources and keywords, and supports critical thinking.

Research is connected

Follow your research journey and connect it via a mind or heat map.

Increased fidelity with the idea that the more functionality the prototype had, the more opportunities we had to identify gaps in understanding.

User Testing

  • Clean and simple UI 

  • Straightforward navigation

  • Effective use of AI

  • Confusing diction

  • Desired features were missing

  • Purpose of research map is unclear

Next Steps

Expand Testing

Broaden the testing across a diverse population of students

More Iterations

Iterate on user testing feedback to ReFinder’s user interface

Collaborate

Establish partnerships with academic institutions

Explore

Integrate AI into ReFinder, thoughtfully and transparently

Let's get in touch!

rebelindesign@gmail.com
/in/rebecca-e-lin/
(201) 213 7980

Let's get in touch!

rebelindesign@gmail.com
/in/rebecca-e-lin/
(201) 213 7980

Let's get in touch!

rebelindesign@gmail.com
/in/rebecca-e-lin/
(201) 213 7980